🔗 Share this article

The future president of the prestigious debating society has been removed from his position after failing a no-confidence vote that came after his controversial social media posts about Charlie Kirk.

The vote against George Abaraonye achieved the required two-thirds threshold to oust him from his position, according to an announcement from the organization.

Contentious Posts

The dispute erupted after Mr Abaraonye reportedly posted messages on social media that seemed to welcome the killing of the American conservative figure, who was fatally shot while addressing a university in the United States.

According to sources, one Instagram post reportedly stated "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an elongated version of the acronym for 'laughing out loud'.

The student leader is also reported to have posted in a WhatsApp chat with other members seeming to express approval of the event.

Election Results

The no-confidence motion was conducted over the weekend, with outcomes announced on Tuesday.

Society announcements showed that over twelve hundred votes were cast in favor of removal, while 501 were against the motion.

The announcement stated that the future president was deemed to have resigned in accordance with the society's regulations.

Procedural Disputes

Proceedings were informally suspended early on Monday after the returning officer was reportedly subjected to "interference, threats, and inappropriate behavior" from multiple individuals.

In a response, the student asserted that the count had been stopped because election administrators believed "no valid outcome could be reached as a result of procedural failures".

His statement categorically refuted that any representative appointed by the student had engaged in intimidating or disruptive behavior.

Ongoing Dispute

The president-elect maintained that significant concerns had been referred to the disciplinary committee and that he remained president-elect.

His statement added that George was "proud and thankful to have the backing of significantly more than half of university members" who voted to have a "secure voting process and resist attempts to subvert democracy".

Critics have argued that any failure to remove him would "demonstrate internationally that the society has chosen ideology over integrity".

External Reactions

On Friday, Mikey McCoy presented an open letter to the society on a related program podcast.

The message criticized the society of becoming a place where "student leaders publicly celebrate the killing of a ideological rival".

The communication indicated that if the student were to remain in post, supporters would "personally contact every American political speaker who has ever graced the union's chamber and urge them never again to lend their name".

The society had previously condemned the student's comments after Kirk's death and stated that complaints filed against him had been referred for official review.

The student leader had been one of multiple members to debate with Kirk at the society in May.